Writer/director Guillermo del Toro (“Pan’s Labyrinth”) once again capitalizes on his fecund imaginative prowess and serves a delicious banquet of fantasy, enchantment, deviousness and subterfuge; “The Shape of Water” weirdly wonderful, is a fantastic, tantalizing, titillating, exquisitely romantic experience.
It is 1962, at a Baltimore research facility an “asset” (Doug Jones) is delivered, caged and howling (aka King Kong) from the Amazon jungle; its warden, “Richard Strickland” (stupendously sleazy, Michael Shannon), with a cattle prod, attempts to tame this half-man, half-amphibian (Del Toro’s work resonates with mythology, “The Shape of Water”, a prescient example), then destroy it, before Russian interference.
Inimitable Sally Hawkins, gives an almost wordless portrayal of mute, cleaning lady “Eliza Esposito”; from the onset, she is unique, a foundling with a strangely scarred neck, an indomitable spirit, fiercely empathetic; working the night shift, present at the arrival of this anonymous creature; fearlessly she befriends him and their relationship stuns with understanding, pristine genuineness; compatibility, generated by a familiarity, shared solely by them. A heart-wrenching, poetic poignancy informs their quiet correspondence, reminiscent of “Beauty and the Beast” and “Cyrano de Bergerac”; beneath the surface harbors decency, goodness.
Flawless casting and cinematography enhance the prodigious scenario: Richard Jenkins, delivers a spectacular portrayal as “Giles”, Eliza’s neighbor, another outsider who joins her clandestine mission to rescue the watery wizard; Octavia Spencer, exponentially grows in her every theatric endeavor, as Eliza’s co-worker “Zelda” a tough, unappreciated woman, who eventually champions and aids in Eliza’s plight; Michael Stuhlbarg, the “good doctor”, with an enigmatic past, compromises his position, as savior and champion. Dan Laustsen’s , rainy, murky, ethereal cinematography, surrealistically adds a Gotham-like, stylistic tone to the film.
Commencing with fantastical floating imagery, to cooking, cleaning, copulation “water” and its magical fluidity, authorizes the viewer to “shape” a gloomy or happy “ever after”.
your posts are a singular pleasure : language rendered as Art. The delicacy, the profound and humane comment of your writings is remarkable. The ‘magical fluidity’ you reference, isn’t it also true for ‘love’; that love. like water, takes the shape of the vessel it’s poured into – be it a man (for Giles), an amphibian (for Eliza)……
Truly appreciate your eloquent comment; amorphous “love” unfathomably, ultimately finds its ideal “vessel”!
Enjoyed your review.
THANK YOU! “HONEY GOOD” P